Tough on Crime is Tough on Canadians

Posted April 12, 2011 under Government, Pirate Party, Rant
People often look to the Conservative party as the party to Americanize Canada… and for good reason, the proposals by the Conservative government have been downright scary (like the attempt to have the United States maintain Canadian boarder crossing or the recent “tough on crime” nonsense). The Torry government isn’t the only scary party though: Every mainstream party has proposed or supported legislation which will invade the privacy and endanger Canadians basic rights afforded to them by the charter.

We need to move forward, and realize that the world isn’t as scary as people in power want us to believe it is. The simple fact is that the more fear that a government creates within it’s citizens, the more motivated they are to support them. Self preservation will always be an issue that brings a person to the polls, and you can count on the fact that the people in power know that.

The Internet is not some great abyss that is only used by criminals to do horrible things, terrorists have no strong interest in hurting Canadians (outside of the abuses that were carried out under the current Prime Minister), and the big pushers of child pornography are not sharing their collections using means that would be detectable by these methods. The government can make a nice shiny graphic to show you the dangers of the world but the dangers are not real. Crime is down in Canada, more people use machetes for murder than long guns, and we have a pretty high population happiness.

Let’s start focusing on issues that matter, social issues, technology issues, the economy, and helping our citizens with disabilities. That’s what I am focusing on, that’s what most third parties are focusing on…so why let the big 3 (I include NDP) steal votes from third parties?


Vancouver Centre – The Home of 21st Century Politics?

Posted March 30, 2011 under Government, Little Brother, The Revolution

I have accepted the nomination by my party to run for Member of Parliament (MP) in the Vancouver Centre riding. I am running on a platform that I do not believe has ever been done before: I am building a system which will take the words of my constituents (if elected), and allow them to use Reddit style voting to determine what I vote and what I present and say to the floor of parliament.

There are a few sides to this coin (or die?), because I of course have my own platforms too. In addition to my core platforms of:

  • End any attempt to put U.S. “security” forces within Canadian borders and encourage Canadian Customs and Border Services Agency to be more open about their search / seizure practices.
  • Join the IWC as an anti-whaling nation and let the rest of the world know that we will not tollerate facades of “research” mask commercial whaling.
  • Increase spending on rural communications projects bringing higher speeds of internet at an affordable rate to people in rural communities.
  • Advocate for all government agencies to use free, open source software to reduce government expenditures on purchases and overall maintenance of the computer networks
  • Implement an inexpensive internet forum and polling website where all of Vancouver Centre’s constituents can continue to make their voices heard in Ottawa after the federal election

I also promise to uphold the Pirate Parties platforms too:

  • Copyright: Reinforce and protect fair dealing, decriminalize non-commercial file sharing, allow content creators to dedicate material to the public domain, and reform crown copyright to ensure open access to Canadians
  • Patent: Reduce terms to 5 years, require a higher standard of originality, and reallocate funds saved in health care due to patent reform to public pharmaceutical research
  • Privacy: Enforce the same privacy laws on electronic communication as the traditional postal service, strengthen the powers of Privacy Commissioner, and fight bills and regulation that violate Canadians’ right to personal privacy
  • Net Neutrality: Reform the CRTC to prevent abuses, fund undersea cables to Europe and Asia rather than relying on American bandwidth, and ensure unfettered access to telecom infrastructure for independent service providers
  • Open Government: Create a combined approach of proactive release of information to the public while easing access by request, expedite freedom of information requests and reduce costs by sharing information digitally, lower or eliminate the cost of filing of FOI requests, strengthen the PSIC, and establish an anonymous online dropbox system
  • Whistleblowers & Free Press: Introduce legislation to protect journalists and whistleblowers
  • Charter Rights: Stand up against violations of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, especially freedom of expression and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure

There will be no surprises though. If a topic doesn’t fall under those topics, then the decision will go to the will of the people in the riding. There is no point, in our age of technology, to vote for one party that thinks they have the answers to everything, people in different areas think differently and before there was no one party that could make the largest amount of people happy while also keeping true to its core values. I feel that in the future this is how all parties will be: A couple core platforms and then calling upon the voter to decide the rest.
Another side to the coin is the fear that the minority will be silenced by having a majority having the ability to downvote ideas that run contrary to their own views. There are a few things we will be doing to decrease the chance of this happening:

  • Myself and helpers will be “moderating” the board, not deleting anything (unless its obvious spam) but looking through posts and finding ones that have been down voted by the community… and tracking the conversations based on that. It’s not always the most upvoted comment that I would bring to the floor of parliament, I would use it as a chance to also bring an alternative view-point (and make sure it was clear to the floor that it was not my own thought, but just A thought that had been brought up.
  • We have been thinking about the possibility to limit the number of downvotes a person can make in a day/week/month to ensure that no person can just downvote every opinion they don’t like, and only downvote ideas that they feel are genuinely flawed or, even better, are just comments that are not productive to the discussion.
  • Adding phone suggestions and an email box that actually gets checked should also allow people who do not want to use the website, or are trying to use the website and keep having their comments downvoted a forum to speak directly to my team / me.

Another advantage is that I am always available, even if I was elected MP I would leave a published phone number and email address (though the number may ring to a voicemail or have an automated system) and reply as frequently as possible. I would also hold weekly IRC meetings so everyone who wanted a chance to say something could log-in and participate.

Are you ready for the politics you always thought were going to be in the future? 2011… that’s future enough for me :)


US Government Owned AMTRAK Hates Freedom

Posted January 31, 2011 under Government, Little Brother, Pirate Party, Rant

I know its seems as though when I travel internationally, I always am posting about some horrible experience that has happened to me. Here is what happened when I took AMTRAK from Seattle to Vancouver today:

I bought a business class ticket to ride the train from Seattle, Washington USA to Vancouver, British Columbia Canada. When I arrived at King Street Station was was made aware that there was a mudslide on the train tracks and they were going to have to change us over to a bus. No big deal, I asked about getting compensated for the difference in fare and the ticket agent told me to call customer service after the trip.

I arrive at the border security check point and was asked for my paperwork, then the Canadian Boarder Services officer asked me some personal questions about why I was in the United States. I told him that the only answers I would be willing to provide were the answers that were what were on my sheet. I was asked to step aside and they were going to X-Ray my bags, I had already anticipated this so I was at the front of the line for customs. A nice gentleman from CBS asked me some questions, I told him that I was not going to answer any question not on the paperwork. He explained to me what the purpose of his job was, and I informed him that I knew of why he asks what he asked, but that I would assert my rights under the Canadian Charter to remain silent. The officer was actually really cool, and we talked while he was scanning my bags and of course he was trying to sneak in questions here and there and I would re-affirm that I would not answer any questions.

By the time that most of the questions were asked everyone was on board the bus ready to go, and the conductor and attendant lady were talking and looking at me. CBS went to this back room to discuss things and I was sitting by myself, so I told the attendant lady that there was an issue and that it wouldn’t be much longer. She was upset and kept going into the CBS room asking them how long it was going to take, but I could see she was actually upset at ME.

Then CBS came back out and asked me to turn on my computer, thats when I asked to see their authority to actually examine the contents of my hard drive (opposed to just looking at my computer which was turned off — side note: My laptops hard drive is dead and I am running a live disk, and I told them this as well). They eventually met my request with enough information that I felt it was appropriate for them to look through my laptop and phone (though I do want to get more information on this).. and again, I didn’t want to hold up the bus too much so I just told them fine, and I also answered some of their more basic questions just to speed up the process.

When CBS went back to talking amongst their selves, the lady told me that if it was going to take any longer she was just going to leave me there and I could find another bus. I asked her when the next bus would come through (it was 12:00PM when this took place), and she said she didn’t know but it would probably be tonight (and thats if they ran a bus that night, because they were talking about running the train on the night trip). I explained to her that things were going as fast as they could, but I wasn’t going to sacrifice my safety or rights to make her happy. She said that there was a chance that they wouldn’t let me into the country anyway, to which I replied “I am a Canadian citizen, I cannot be denied re-entry into Canada” and she said “they can do whatever they want!”. I just laughed and explained that I knew the law a little better then she did, and that there was no way I could be denied re-entry — the only possible option would be for me to be arrested.

When the CBS agents came to talk to me again, I told them “look I am sorry this has caused issues, I am morally and legally against answering questions without a lawyer present, but I don’t want to inconvenience the bus riders, and they said they were going to leave without me — just let me answer whatever you want so we can go”. Thats when the CBS manager (badge number 11233 – No kidding) told me (paraphrased) “I already told her she can’t leave until you are on board, take your time if you feel like a question is uncomfortable it’s within your rights to not answer”. I still tried to cooperate a bit more, only answering the most basic questions “Yes I lived in Alaska” “My address is written down as Teacher Housing because thats where I was, there was no street addresses there”. Again, CBS is a million times better than US Border Patrol and they understood that I wasn’t up to anything bad, but that I was just protecting myself.

I met with the CBS agents one more time, and they basically said all is good, and we were going over our final procedures to let me go on my way and the AMTRAK lady barges in again and says “this bus is late and we need to have a reason, so I want your name and these agents wont give it to me”. I wrote it down and then then CBS and I were talking about personal privacy and stuff (I saw that they had pulled out my Pirate Party Canada membership card, and I wanted to clarify the reason for them to single that card out of my wallet rather than the 20 other cards I have, and CBS officer told me that he was just interested in the party, and was looking through the platforms), he was talking about how CBS had policies in place to protect personal privacy too and thats why he wouldn’t give her my name even though I was on her bus. The CBS agent also told me that he had informed the AMTRAK lady that it was not my fault that I was being questioned and that it actually happens routinely. I said “she seems cranky to me” and he agreed, ha!

They finally let me go and the CBS agent apologized to the AMTRAK lady and she told him “Oh you don’t have to be sorry, it wasn’t YOUR fault.” looking at me. I got on the bus and we arrived 40 minutes late, but my rights are still intact (for the most part, the looking through my cell phone and laptop still doesn’t sit well with me) — and everyone made their connections. AMTRAK is a corporation owned by the United States Government just like NASA and USPS, you would hope that a company like that would be able to respect basic things like “rights” but it was simply not the case in this story. Then again, thats probably why they have gone bankrupt so many times and had to be bought out by the Government in the first place!


We Must Be Patriots of the Digital Revolution

Posted December 12, 2010 under Government, Little Brother, Rant, The Revolution
Many years ago we came here to share new ideas and to escape persecution by our peers for having independent thought. When we came here, we created our own culture with our own set of internal laws. Once we became wildly successful an oppressive government came to take away everything that we had built, claiming it was theirs.
This is the story that all Americans are taught as children in school, they are taught that its the story of America, but that’s not what I am writing about. The above is the story of the Internet. The history of foundation of the United States and the Internet have many parallels, and the US Government understands that. This is why they are cracking down, taking websites offline, and attempting to silence free speech:
The United States Federal Government knows that if the Internet continues unchecked, we will continue to circumvent the authority of the worlds governments and create a system which changes the traditional laws that have been used to rule us for centuries. As citizens learn about the abuses of their government they become more distrusting and even more educated, which encourages governments to keep the worlds people apathetic.
In the end we will become a unified world, with small local governments maintaining their own areas. All humans will share the basic rights which will not be able to be taken away by anyone.
So, just as the Patriots of the American Revolution stood up and fought for the country that they built, I encourage the Patriots of the Digital Revolution to stand up for the culture and society that they have built. A free and unrestricted Internet is critical to our future, its our job to protect it.


Sharing is Communist

Posted October 4, 2010 under Little Brother, Short Stories
“Jane, will you please step out into the hall way with me?” asks Mrs. Sanriaa.
Jane was always getting in trouble for her ability to share with other students. That is, she would get in trouble for giving her toys to other students, without asking for anything in return. Mrs. Sanriaa was her 1st grade school teacher, and was determined to remove this communist/socialist behavior that was not natural.
As they walk into the hallway Mrs. Sanriaa asks her, “Jane, why dose Trevor have the ball you were playing with?”
“Because he asked for it Mrs. Sanriaa.” Even though Jane has been told this was wrong, she always seemed to do it anyway.
“So what did he give you in return?” Asked Mrs. Sanriaa who seemed to be towering over Jane.
Jane never understood what was wrong with sharing, “There were other toys, I just got another one.”
“So you think that your time is worth nothing? You had to pull out the ball, Jane. You were playing with it and having fun, and Trevor didn’t do anything to help you. Don’t you understand that in society its important to exchange your time and effort, for something of value to you?” Mrs. Sanriaa has tried to explain this to Jane over and over again in the past, “If you start giving your time away now, then others will think its okay to give away their time to help others too, and if we do that, do you know what will happen, Jane?”
“Everyone will be happier?” Jane answered honestly, with the first response that came to mind.
“Don’t back talk young lady, you are going to stay in the hall and think about your answer.” With that, Mrs. Sanriaa walked back into her classroom to watch the students as they worked.
As Jane stood in the hallway she thought about it, truthfully and honestly thought about it. The idea that sharing her ball with Trevor could make people go homeless (as she has been told before), made her sad. It didn’t make sense though, ‘how does sharing something make someone lose their house?’ Jane wondered.
It felt like hours, though it had only been 5 minutes, when Mrs. Sanriaa had come back into the hallway, “So what do you have to say for yourself?”
“I am sorry, Mrs. Sanriaa.” Jane didn’t understand the point of an apology yet, but understood that when you said you were sorry, after doing something wrong, it usually made the teacher less mad.
“What are you sorry for, Jane?” Mrs. Sanriaa looked over her glasses as she gave Jane a look that could scare anything with a pulse.
“I…I don’t know, Mrs. Sanriaa.” Jane started to feel the tears well up in her eyes, she didn’t know why she was being yelled at, she didn’t understand. She felt bad for making people lose their jobs, but didn’t understand how making people happy, can cause people to lose their jobs. None of it made sense to her.  Maybe it was because she was only 6, that she just couldn’t understand it. Sharing her toys, makes people around her happy. She had already got the ball, so she didn’t see the need for her friend to get another ball, just to play around with it for a couple minutes. Sharing just made sense to her.  She knew, somewhere inside her that what she was doing was right, even as a first grader she knew that by sharing her toys with others, they would  share with her, that everyone had more fun, with less hassles.
Mrs. Sanriaa took away Janes recess, and she couldn’t play with toys for the next week. When she was able to play, she shared them again.


« Older | Newer »